Are Gmos Healthy - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1075 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/02/14 Category Health Essay Level High school Tags: GMO Essay Did you like this example? Many people in the United States are not knowledgeable in or even care much about nutrition labels or what goes into their food, but GMOs whether productive are destructive have become almost impossible to avoid. GMOs are genetically modified organisms that have been commercialized and expanded in the passed two decades. There are many opposing views on whether GMOs are ethical. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Are Gmos Healthy?" essay for you Create order These issues have even stemmed controversy in politics, but what are the cons that have left people with a bad perception of GMOs and what kind of negative effects could they be causing. The most common type of gene modification occurs in food. Gene modification has not been around for that long or has not been tested extremely. Many of the side effects of modifying genes if any at all are still unknown due to how young it is. The FDA has approved this modification in many crops such as corn, tomatoes, and apples. These type of modifications can cause the crops to lose their nutritional value. According to the article, Pros and Cons of GMO Crop Farming, â€Å"Genetic modification often adds or mixes proteins that were not native to the original plant, which might cause new allergic reactions in the human body† (Lehrer Bannon, 2005). Since modifying crops is still fairly new, the genetic makeup might accidentally create more or less of certain nutrients, that the body would need to maintain homeostasis. Additionally, the human body can also become allergic to these new substances and react negatively. These genetically modified foods can even be found in animal food as well that may affect the consumers. Corn is a common genetically modified food that is feed to many life stock we consume such as cows, pigs, and chickens. Since we do not fully understand any effect that these GMOs have on livestock. We also do not understand what will happen when we eat said animals that are obtaining their sole nutrients from genetically modified corn. More testing and data is required for anyone to make an accurate statement on the health risks of GMOs on humans. One of the most powerful arguments against Genetically modified organisms is the moral aspect to genetically modifying an organism. Many people claim it is not in our rights as a human to change nature. There are some who state it is not within our jurisdiction to play God and edit organisms genomes. In response to this claim I found a quote by Michael Specter that states â€Å"All the food we eat every grain of rice and kernel of corn has been genetically modified. None of it was here before mankind learned to cultivate crops. The question isnt whether our food has been modified, but how.† It seems as though GMOs may be inescapable in our modern age. Despite the cry from many concerned individuals over GMOs, there are a few reasons why some people claim they are not all bad and may have the potential to be a positive thing in the food market. GMO supporters will state that GMO crops yield bigger crops and are cheaper to grow as well which may aid in the ever increasing demand for food as our country’s population continues to grow. According to an article by the foundation education â€Å"Genetically modified crops are cheaper to grow despite the higher initial modified seed costs. It seems that modified crops are sturdier, standing up to more weather extremes and requiring less expensive pesticides and herbicides.† All of the pros for GMOs are very enticing, and have dramatically changed how the food industry operates, yet many people still arent convinced. There are many people demanding food providers to label foods with GMOs in them. According to the website, Nongmoproject.org, â€Å"While a 2015 ABC News survey found that 93% of Americans believe genetically modified foods should be labelled†¦Ã¢â‚¬  There are waves of people who are concerned with what negative consequences GMOs may provide when they are consumed. There are many people who seek organic fruits and vegetables to avoid any risk that GMOs may provide. Although GMOs currently have a bad reputation in the past decades they have revolutionized our crop efficiency and our ability to yield more food. The major argument against GMOS according to my understanding is that there is no sure answer to if they can negatively affect humans after long term consumption. If scientists could finally complete tests proving GMOs were safe for human consumption, they would be able to release a statement that clears GMOs of its bad name. GMOs if safe for human consumption can be continually developed by science to help many malnutritioned countries who often have a difficult time providing crops. Whether we agree with GMOs or not they are here to stay, unless a new study provides definitive proof that GMOs are unfit for human consumption we can be looking towards even more genetically modified organisms to hit the supermarket aisles. Plants will not be the only GMOs, in the near future we may have â€Å"disease-resistant pigs, bird-flu resistant chickens, hornless dairy cows and highly productive sheep.† This may seem scary to some but to others this is a revolution in the food market that can both be highly profitable and useful in the fight versus malnutrition. There are many points of interest when considering if GMOs are a positive or negative thing, but I myself believe in the positivity that science can bring to the dinner table.† As long as GMOs are safe and our eyes are peeled for any issues I personally see no reason why science should not continue its efforts. The future of genetically modified organisms can lead to drive food prices lower and even be used in impoverished overpopulated countries in an effort to end world hunger which in my opinion would not be half bad. In conclusion I find it hard to come up with a definitive answer to whether GMOs are positive or negative, but I can appreciate peoples concern for their health but we cannot deny the potential that comes from genetically modified organisms. In fact our fear for the unknown may hold us back from even greater discovery. Science will never stop, there are always people working towards developing new technology and the ability to edit genres is in our realm of cap abilities whether we are scared of the future or whether we embrace it time will till regarding genetically modified organisms in the good market.

Health care is a huge part of a persons being, but not...

Health care is a huge part of a persons being, but not really affordable to all Americans, everyone should have the right to affordable health care in the U.S. 46.3 million People in the U.S were uninsured in 2008 for affordable health care (1) Health care is the biggest industry, employing more than 14 million people. Ever since health care has been around people have had it. After it originated and spread through the nation people had it because they needed protection. On a day to day basis people are surrounded by danger and risks of getting hurt. Well if people do get hurt, how are they supposed to help themselves get better if they’re not protected? Health care is a huge importance to everyone out in the world, and those who have†¦show more content†¦Nowadays, everyone talks about affordable health care and how they need it. Our current president Barack Obama has put in motion ‘ObamaCare’. The meaning for ObamaCare is the patient protection and affordable care act (PPACA). It is also commonly referred to as Obama care, health care reform, or the affordable care act (ACA). The affordable care act was signed into law to reform the health care industry by the president on March 23, 2010. Obama Cares goal is to give more American’s leeway to affordable, quality health care insurance, and to reduce the growth of deaths and sicknesses around the states. Before this, the cost of health care was becoming way too expensive for many working families. 62.1% of all of the US bankruptcies in 2007-2008 were related to medical bills and expenses. And the 78% of those bankruptcies were filled by people who had health care at the time (2). The affordable care act allows the availability, affordability, and quality of public and also private health insurance through consumer protections, taxes, insurance exchanges, and other reforms. These are just some of the things that health care can do for us if we all have it protecting us. This is all important to us because not only is it benefiting others but it’s also benefiting the world around us in many different ways possible. Even though health care has many branches it weighs out everywhere in this world and those who cannot afford it, should have it anyways. Health care--Show MoreRelatedUniversal Healthcare Is A Human Right That Everyone Should1750 Words   |  7 PagesUniversal healthcare is a human right that everyone should be entitled to; it should be a right and never a privilege. Universal healthcare is the right to refer to a health care system that focuses on providing health care and financial protection to all it citizens of that particular country. Many citizens in the United States do not have health care because of how expensive it can be, and its price is advertised as though it is a luxury when in actuality that is not the case. Therefore UniversalRead MoreGeneral Motive Behind The Plan Is Not A Bad One1719 Words   |  7 Pagesprices and find a safe way to make it available to everyone. Obama did not consider quite a few variables in the planning phase of this project. For one, While Obama is all for studying which medical procedures are worthwhile for patients; he does not think to include doctors in these government conversations. He is not completely gripping onto the fact the government and the medical industry probably wants the same thing when it comes to health care: to lower the price. Leaving these two groups separateRead MoreThe Ranked Healthcare System Globally1365 Words   |  6 Pagesdescribed as a health care system which provides healthcare to all citizens of a country. Healthcare is paid for by the taxation of employers and employees and coverage is considered mandatory. Almost all medical-care services are included and paid for in this way. (Silver, George A., and Sparer, Michael S.) This is different from America in the way that the U.S. expects individuals to pay for their expenses by themselves and the help of pricy insurance that can not be used for all health costs. OurRead MoreHealthcare And Health Care Policies1627 Words   |  7 Pagesplethora of critical and important information regarding healthcare and health care policies in the United States and in the world while I took UC 105 and 106 as part of the Health Sciences Scholars Program. One of the topics that stuck out to me the most during the lecture was the topic of constrained choice. For me, this topic really resonated with me since I understood some of the constrained choices and decisions that many Americans have to go through on a daily basis. I also saw the inequalities andRead MoreHomelessness : America s Resources For The Homeless Are Scarce1452 Words   |  6 Pagescitizens from being homeless. We have to work together as a community and provide housing a range of support services, such as addiction treatment, mental health services, medical treatment, intensive case management, assertive community treatment, critical time intervention, and ecologically based family therapy. 1 Justin Hooks February 27th, 2015 Resources for the Homeless are Scarce in America Homeless citizens don’t receive enough support. â€Å"Seven out of 10 Americans are one pay checkRead MoreAmerica s Affordable Childcare Or Early Education For Children1346 Words   |  6 PagesSanders For President â€Å"Every working family in America knows how hard it is today to find affordable childcare or early education for children.† - Bernie Sanders. This quote is just one reason why Bernie is an amazing choice to be president. it shows how much he cares about how American children do not get the education they need, or how hard it is for the people to even afford health care. These two ideas need to be mandatory for a better nation. Bernie has the answer in this day and age to helpRead MoreObesity Is A Large Problem That The United States Faces Today Essay1629 Words   |  7 PagesHealth is important because the healthier you are the less likely you are to have illnesses and injuries and the more likely you are to be able to help out others in your community. Health has three components to it. Health includes physical activity, healthy diet, and mental health. Unhealthy lifestyles are usually expressed through obesity. Although, you can eat healthy and not exercise, and vise v ersa, the maximum level of health is achieved through the combination of physical activity, healthyRead MoreHealthcare : The United Kingdom s And Brazil s Systems That Are Failing1767 Words   |  8 PagesFree† Healthcare shouldn’t be Free Socialized Healthcare is the act of giving people below the poverty line a way to have health coverage in case of something happening to them or their families. This is not a good idea because these people cannot afford for themselves so why should other people have to pay for them. I am writing this to tell you how â€Å"free† healthcare really is not free. The main points I will be covering are The United States’ healthcare system also known as Obamacare, The UnitedRead MoreThe Affordable Care Act ( Aca )2302 Words   |  10 PagesSummary of Learning A. Impetus for Health Reform According to Medicaid.gov, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides Americans with better health security by putting in place comprehensive health insurance reforms that will, expand coverage, hold insurance companies accountable, lower health care costs, guarantee more access, and enhance the quality of care for all Americans. However, prior to the existence of the ACA, the American healthcare system left a lot to be desired and still today leavesRead MoreUniversal Health Care Is A Government Run System1577 Words   |  7 PagesUniversal health care, also known as universal health coverage, is a specific type of health care where everyone is provided coverage regardless of his or her income, race, age, pre-existing conditions, gender, or wealth. In other words, as long as one is a legal resident of the region that is being covered, he or she is eligible for universal health care. The purpose of universal health care is to provide all citizens with an opportunity to obtain the health care that they may need without having

A Summary Review on Kaffir Boy by Mark Mathebane Free Essays

In the book Kaffir Boy by Mark Mathebane there are many obstacles that Mark the protagonist has to overcome. The first of his problems was to get through school in his poor South African ghetto. The second was to achieve his goal and receive a tennis scholarship to an American college. We will write a custom essay sample on A Summary Review on Kaffir Boy by Mark Mathebane or any similar topic only for you Order Now Mark†s father is one of the major antagonist, he was opposed anything to do with Mark getting an education in a school. He was a very traditional man and he didn†t like anything that had to do with the â€Å"white man†. He thought it was nonsense to get a whiteman†s education and he wouldn†t provide the money that was necessary to get Mark through school. Mark was helped through this situation by his Mother who was the person who wanted Mark so desperately to attend school. She decided to go against Mark†s Father and send Mark to school. She then had to get a job which was illegal for her to do so because she didn†t have the required pass from the South African government. With the little money that his mother made and some money that his grandmother gave him he was able to pay for his schooling or at least some of it. He often was without the required materials like a school uniform and books. This then resulted in Mark being beaten at school. These beatings became so intense and often that Mark thought about dropping out of school. His Mother helped him decide that he should stay in school because she knew that an education was the only way out of their life of poverty. Through the support of Mark†s Mother and grandmother Mark found success in school. He almost always was ranked in the top of his class and received scholarships to continue on in school. At the end of Mark†s schooling he receives a job offering in South Africa for him to work as a anger of the company, he decides to accept this job for the time being because his family needed the money to send his brothers and sisters to school. Mark end up successfully making it through school and ending up being one of the top in his class. The second major conflict in the book was that Mark wanted to get a scholarship to an American college. Mark first started playing tennis in the ghetto and became the best player in Alexandria. He practiced at a ranch that he found where he made friends with the owner of the tennis ranch. This was against the law because the owner was a white South African and native Africans could not play with them. Marked learned allot from the owner and gained experience because he was entered in some tournaments by the owner of the tennis ranch. When an international tournament came to South Africa Mark was asked to play in it as a native African player to show to the rest of the world that the apartheid laws separating the native Africans were being changed. This was not true though, the native Africans were being allowed to play in only a few selected tournaments as examples. Since this was not fair to the native Africans they decided to boycott the event. Mark decided to play in this tournament even though he was considered a traitor to his people and was banned from playing in the native African tournaments for life. This decision changed his life because he met a famous American tennis star which helped his apply to many American colleges. Through Mark†s own inner strength and self determination he achieves his goal and he received a full college scholarship to an American college. How to cite A Summary Review on Kaffir Boy by Mark Mathebane, Papers

Law and Constitution free essay sample

The advantages of a codified constitution now outweigh the disadvantages† Discuss (40) The fact that the issue of the UK’s need for a codified constitution has managed to remain relevant despite centuries of prolonged deliberation, is not only testament to its importance as an issue but equally so to it’s significance and how it could potentially affect the UK as a whole. A codified constitution is a constitution made up of a set of laws that an individual or set of people have made and agreed upon for governmental use and is most importantly documented in a single place. In theory, the documentation of a codified constitution appears to make minimal difference to the executive and judiciary system, however, in common practice the advantages of a codified constitution in present day UK in regards to the executive, judiciary and society as a whole do not outweigh the disadvantages. This is due the fact that many of the issues which point toward the advantages of a codified constitution, such as modernization, rights and adaptability also reveal distinct social and political disadvantages to the incorporation of a codified constitution; ultimately the use of other tenuous links fail to alter the fact that the advantages of a codified constitution do not outweigh the disadvantages at the present moment in time. One of the primary hindrances in regards to whether the advantages of a codified constitution now outweigh the disadvantages is its sense of a lack of social mobility and a failure to adapt, which in many ways branches into the topic of modernisation, whilst also begging the question as to whether or not modernisation is worth taking when bearing in mind the potential extent of governmental paralysis in which it creates in relation to the legislation process. This in affect further prohibits the extent in which the Legislature can maneuver, which as previously stated undermines it’s power of legitimacy. In regards to adaptability however, the fundamental premise in which the implementation of a codified constitution is found wanting is it’s rigid nature in terms if natural progression. This is in sharp contrast to the current uncodified format of Britain’s current constitution which has used its flexible nature to allow natural adaptation to the tune of social change. So, for example, the non-political role of the monarchy has gradually evolved and adapted for over a century showing that odernisation must not strictly take place in the form of a codifying the British constitution. Similarly, Parliament has rarely experienced any dramatic changes to its powers and procedures due to no dramatic need to do so, however, it has still adapted itself to the progressive nature of modern government cautiously, rationally and of course progressively, in both past and present, once again highlighting Britain’s need to continue on this trend of gradual adaptation whilst als o not compromising on the concept of modernisation. Ultimately in practical terms in regards to the issue of adaptability, the documentation of a codified constitution would stifle a fundamental aspect of the current British constitution weakening the view that the advantages of a codified constitution now outweigh the disadvantages. The rigid nature of the constitution as well as being clear in the aspect of adaptability is similarly mirrored in it’s black and white viewing towards declaring the rights of those residing within any given area, in this case the UK. In many respects it could be viewed that the black and white nature of the constitution could be beneficial and remove any grey areas that still remain within the British Judiciary system in particularly in relation to rights. The creation of a codified constitution potentially entails the entrenchment of The Human Rights Act (2000) to protect the rights of citizens within the UK. The codification of the constitution could lead to the rights of those within the UK taking some sort of tangible format, and during a time in which fervent interest in rights is groomed along by those who seek it’s entrenchment, there could potentially be some reasoning behind this being an advantage of codification as well as the prospect of enhanced patriotism. Although, with multiculturalism so prominent within the UK it is difficult to imagine enhanced patriotism being of significant importance. What must be said though is that in anyone’s mind the preservation of the rights of citizens is a firmly reassuring idea. Furthermore, It could be argued that the Human Rights Act does not go far enough as by preserving parliamentary sovereignty and making parliamentary legislation an exception to it’s jurisdiction, the act fails to deal with the fundamental issue in the British constitution; that is, the enormous power of central government and its complete control over parliament. This, in the eyes of cynics at east, feeds into the argument of codification as had the Human Rights Act been binding on parliamentary legislation, it may have represented a major check on governmental power. However, what must be said is that however weak cynics may sight the Human Rights Act and view codification as some form of panacea, there are a few cases of practical evidence to show otherwise with the anti-terrorism legislation of 2004 a primary example which contradicts claims that the Act is weak, this, despite the fact that the issue of Human rights in relation to the creation of a codified constitution and its advantages does on the whole seem a credible one. A final point in regards to this issue would be where the creation of a codified constitution would leave Common Law. Common Law is a system in which law is derived from previous cases in court and is adapted upon. This of course brings together the previous topic of adaptability in regards to Human Rights, making one wonder whether there would ever be minimal adaptation to Human Rights through common law or any issue in the constitution for that matter. However the common misconception that no amendments can be made to a constitution is void; however a significant amount of time and money is usually the cost. This plays into the fact that there is a minor issue with codification in this particular branch of Human Rights, however this issue is not representative in the wider picture as a whole, with Human Rights a credible advantage of codification when weighed against its disadvantages. What must not be forgotten in all of this however is that the nature of the current constitutional format is relatively democratic and whilst in theory the transitional period may run smoothly, the change to a codified constitution may in fact be disruptive to the political process which may indirectly hinder the manner in which democracy is used within the UK in the short-term. However, by the same token, it could be claimed that the codification of a constitution could create clarity in terms of rights linking into the previous topic whilst not only aiding the entrenchment of key concepts in relation to democracy such as rights but creating a plausible argument in favor of the advantages of a codified constitution in regards to the current system. Ultimately though whilst a plausible argument is created in favor of the statement that the advantages of a codified constitution now outweigh the disadvantages is created, it must not be overlooked that there would undoubtedly be a potentially damaging transitional period, and this coupled with the fact that so many of the arguments in favor of a codified constitution seem mainly plausible in theory as opposed to practice equally re-affirms the idea that the advantages of a codified constitution as of now at least do not outweigh those of the current system. Therefore, when all is weighed into consideration the advantages of a codified constitution cannot be considered to outweigh the disadvantages as of now due to numerous flaws, as well tenuous links. Whilst the constitution may be amended similarly to the US and in theory appear to represent an element of stability, the fact that there has only been 1 amendment in the last 20 years, whilst many of its amendments have been due to prominent political issues as opposed to smaller yet highly relevant social matters, is equally as damning in its refusal to keep pace with an ever changing western society. This is highlighted in terms of entrenchment, which aligns society with concepts which in truth are redundant but are upheld purely because of entrenchment, bringing to light the fact that in the short-term modernising the UK in the form of a single document is not worth having it lost in archaic doldrums that will almost certainly hinder society in the long-term. The issue of short-term and long-term is similarly mirrored in regards to the transitional period bound to ensue once codification takes place. This ultimately begs the question as to whether or not the many of the tenuous advantages of codification really supplement the political imbalance and dysfunction that will likely ensue in the short-term especially in an era in which the public’s sense of patience justifiably wears thinner and thinner. As well as this, the inception of devolution and Blair’s Labour Parties other constitutional reforms post 1997 are representative of the flexibility of the current constitutional format, and as of now have made the need for codification ultimately superfluous, as opposed to pre 1997, as in reality the advantages of a codified constitution do not outweigh the disadvantages, and in truth; never will.